One thing we stand for here, is freedom of speech, and everybody being entitled to air their own opinion on stuff.
So, with so much fuss being made over the Chris, Fox, BillyBobCesspool and the ‘bottle’ saga, here’s my view of it all.
To start off, this is a short clip taken from FoxmanShawn’s cast last night, where he was taking quite a lot of abuse from the guests.
This is the point a lot of people are missing. I’ve seen plenty of people having a go at Foxman and Billy for apparently making Chris do it.
Ok, let’s take a look at the facts that surround this video. Chris was attempting to insert a bottle in his anus for cash. Nothing else, just (what he thought he was getting) hard cash!
So Foxman and Billy made this poor, innocent, hetrosexual, perform such a degrading act, for cash that he desperately needed.
Yeah, sounds bad doesn’t it! But here’s a few points that contradict all that.
1) Chris is a self confessed bisexual man. If you offered NateTheGreat £60 to give Damon a blowjob, would that be abuse?
2) Talking of blowjobs, remember Chris bragging about being took out for the night, in return for giving Michael oral sex down a back alley? Remember, he said he’s “not gonna suck a cock for free” So Chris clearly doesn’t mind performing sex acts for cash.
3) Some people are criticizing Fox for not paying up the cash. Well, is this not karma? Only earlier on that day, Chris was bragging about how this Kitty gave him £20 for booze, because he said he was skint. So skint in fact, that it was that same morning Chris posted twice on Facebook asking for donations. Yet when he was pulled on how he got all that booze for £20, he admitted that he had £60 in his bank all along. So, is him conning Kitty, not the same as Fox conning Chris?
Look, lets not beat around the bush here. Chris did what he did, solely for money. If Fox had paid up, i’m sure Chris would of been online, boasting how he made £60 just for shoving a bottle up his ass.
As it happened, Mr Sexy had the tables turned on him, and it was he for once, who got shafted (excuse the pun)
Any mention of money and chris will do something for it, he’s not as stupid as he makes out.
He loves the attention, and any chance of more free money.
1) yes, it would be sexual abuse.
2) that was also sexual abuse.
3) people are free to say whatever they would like online and ask for money. It is however not okay to abuse them emotionally or sexually.
Until you wake up and realize that Chris is mentally challenged and needs protection, not exploitation – you won’t get it. http://scuttletards.blogspot.uk – you will see the abuse exposed, and I will continue to expose it.
Quote ” people are free to say whatever they would like online” eerr, wasn’t you only saying a couple of days ago, that i shouldn’t be giving my opinion on how John Crosby ( Freestyleradio1) dresses?
This is just typical Ryan. Doesn’t care who slates who, as long as it’s not somebody he likes.
Must be good up there in Ryan’s World 😉
I should have worded my comment differently, so you couldn’t try to read something into it that wasn’t there. I don’t blame you for trying. What was meant was that when someone asks for money online, or does something you might not agree with behind the camera – it is not your right to ridicule and make fun of. It is not your right to emotionally abuse the person. You chose to reply with a sly comment here rather than address the actual issue on the post about ‘John’s dress’. Why didn’t you reply there?
You see, people have a right to cast without being criticized, and blogs that hurt others should be eradicated.
I should have worded my comment differently, so you couldn’t try to read something into it that wasn’t there. I don’t blame you for trying. What was meant was that when someone asks for money online, or does something you might not agree with behind the camera – it is not your right to ridicule and make fun of. It is not your right to emotionally abuse the person. You chose to reply with a sly comment here rather than address the actual issue on the post about ‘John’s dress’. Why didn’t you reply there? Read my 2nd part also “it is however not okay to abuse them”. Your comments are abuse.
You see, people have a right to cast without being criticized, and blogs that hurt others should be eradicated.
The reason i replied here, is simply because this is where you made the comment i quoted. May i quote you again Sir? ” You see, people have a right to cast without being criticized”
Now, remind me again what you were saying about Ravemen on the other day?
Oh, just in case you forget, here it is:
“As for the post about Raveman….he annoys the piss out of everyone and flirts with all the women and tries to get nudes from them. This person keep having technical issues and never listens to advice. I once cleaned his PC remotely and there were over 2,000 infections in Malwarebytes. Then 2-3 days later it was all mucked up again so I said you’re on your own. There are people that it’s okay to make comments about, he’s one of them. He’s not an innocent party at all…” Ryan – 16th Sept 2015
Just like every other comment you make on here and Scuttlebutts, you contradict yourself. First you clearly say it’s ok to make comments about some people, then, you say we shouldn’t comment on anybody.
As i said, you twist things to fit your own agenda. If it’s about MichelleStacy, Raveman etc, then you agree it’s fine to comment about them. If it’s somebody you like, you say us blogs shouldn’t comment on people and their actions.
Think we’re finished here now eh 😉
I’m allowed to call someone out, Karl. If you cannot see the difference between calling someone out for damaging behavior to others versus simply making fun of them, trolling them, ridiculing them – then there is no hope.
Ryan I take it you did not see Chris Complaining to his Mum that Foxman owes him money, when mum asked why he told her why.
Chris was sober when he told his mum this, he knows what he’s doing, he’s just pissed off because he never got paid for it.
‘The Fly Swatter’ – you’re assuming. What are you assuming? Let me explain. You’re assuming Chris has the capability that you and I have, the capability to understand when we’re doing something harmful to ourselves or others, and what is right and what is wrong. Someone made a promise to him they would give him money. It is wrong to NOT give that money after promising it. It is also wrong to offer money for sexual abuse / favors on webcam. So we have 2 things that Foxman and Billybobcesspool have done wrong. 1 – encouraging someone to harm themselves, and promoting sexual abuse. 2 – promising someone money then not giving it.
Ryan, when it comes to damage limitation, you are a disaster. Quote ” i’m allowed to call someone out”
So, are you now saying that only YOU can call somebody out?
Seriously, you need to quit now.
Let’s try this again shall we. There is a large difference between ‘calling someone out’ on making hurtful comments about someone. You have called SexyChrisWhile several names and insults for example in your posts about him. When I speak of Raveman for example, I use hard facts from my experience, never any name calling or insults. When I ‘call you out’, I’m telling you it’s not right to say hurtful things or make hurtful posts about others. When you ‘call me out’, you try to say that I’m just like you when I’m not at all like you. I don’t stoop to the level of insults, and my blog doesn’t make posts highlighting what I don’t like about certain casters. If you cannot see the difference, I cannot help you.
Hard facts? That’s simply not true. You claimed that Raveman is unwelcome in lots of channels, but that is just your opinion, as i have have seen John welcomed in plenty of casts.
Anyway, you have your own blog now, so i will post it here and give you some helpful advice.
Well, i’ve tried to reply / comment 3 times tonight but your website and cloudfare don’t like to cooperate and have super high ping times.